Introduction A community’s drinking water supply comes from ground and surface water sources.
They are formulated for any contaminant that may have adverse effects on human health and every company that prepares drinking water has to follow them up. Furthermore, So there’re many edges and drawbacks on drinking demineralised water. These prescribe which substances can be in drinking water and what the maximum concentrations of these substances are. With all that said… There are a few problems that can endanger the quality of the drinking water and So it’s that the minerals present in water intervene with our body functions. With all that said… Surface water has to undergo a lot more purification steps than groundwater to become suited to drink. Doesn’t it sound familiar, is that the case? In fact, not all substances present in water are necessarily harmful to our health. Anyway, the main guidelines about drinking water standards are published by the World Health Organization and by the European Union. This is the case. Water almost or completely free of dissolved minerals because of distillation, deionisation, membrane filtration, electrodialysis and similar technology is called demineralised water. It can miss every country’s regulations require communities to treat and disinfect drinking water before distributing it to the public. The standards are called maximum contaminant levels. You should take it into account. While causing a mineral deficit, The arguments against drinking demineralised water are that we lost a primary source of necessary minerals in our diet and that water that has lost its own minerals will attract and absorb minerals in our body.
Recent research showed that the percentage of salt consumed by drinking softened water is insignificant when compared to overall daily salt intake, there is much publicity over the years about the negative health effects of drinking softened water.
Lenntech. Essentially, for more information go to our home water filter web page. Over the past 25 years research has continued to amass in support of the beneficial role of minerals in water.
In the draft of the rolling revision of the WHO guidelines for drinkingwater quality, titled ‘Health risks from drinking demineralised water’ by Kožíšek, the possible health consequences of low mineral content water consumption are divided in the categories.
It had been demonstrated that consuming water of low mineral content has a negative effect on homeostasis mechanisms. Homeostasis literally means ‘same state’ and it depends on the process of keeping the internal body environment in a steady state. Inadequate body water redistribution may compromise the function of vital organs. Anyways, while taking them from the body reserves, German study carried out by th German ciety for nutrition proved instead that if distilled water is ingested, the intestine has to add electrolytes to this water. Then again, in his publication Kožíšek states that experiments in animals have repeatedly shown that the intake of demineralized water leads to diuresis, extra cellular fluid volume and serum concentration of sodium and chlorine ions and their increased elimination from the body, lower volumes of light red blood cells and similar hematocritic changes. Ok, and now one of the most important parts. After the ingestion of distilled water the electrolytes dissolved in the body water are further dilute.
In the past, acute health problems were reported in mountain climbers who had prepared their beverages with melted snow. Researches and studies proved that water low in magnesium can cause increased morbidity and mortality form cardiovascular disease, higher risk of motor neuronal disease, pregnancy disorders. Notice, lack both in calcium and in magnesium can also cause can be associated with higher risk of fracture in children, certain neurodegenerative diseases, preterm birth and low weight at birth.
The contribution of water to uptake of some essential elements for humans is important as long as the modern diets are often not an adequate source of can be a risk factor for hypertension and coronary heart disease, gastric and duodenal ulcers, chronic gastritis, goitre, pregnancy complications and a few complications in infants. Ok, and now one of the most important parts. Lutai on two populations living in areas with different levels of dissolved minerals showed that the population of the location supplied with water low in minerals showed higher incident rates of these disease. Have you heard of something like that before? Children living in this area exhibited slower physical development and more growth abnormalities, pregnant women suffered more frequently from oedema and anaemia.
If soft water is used for cooking it can cause substantial losses of all essential elements from food. It’s vital to not loose essential elements and nutrients during cooking, since the current diet of many people does not provide all the necessary elements in sufficient quantities. In contrast, Therefore in case hard water is used, the loss of these elements is much lower. In the areas supplied with soft water, we have to keep in mind not only a lower intake of magnesium and calcium from drinking water but also a lower intake of magnesium and calcium from food due to cooking in such water.
Low mineralised water is highly aggressive to materials with which it comes into contact. Calcium and to a lower extent also magnesium in both drinking water and food were previously found to have a beneficial antitoxic effect since they prevent -via either a direct reaction resulting in a no absorbable compound or competition for binding sites -absorption or reduce harmful effects of some toxic elements such heavy metals. Calcium and magnesium in water and food are known to have an antitoxic activity. On top of that, it easily adsorbs metals and some organic substances from pipes, coatings, storage tanks and containers. Population supplied with ‘low mineral’ water might be at a higher risk regarding the adverse effect from exposure to toxic substances compared to populations supplied with water of average mineralization.
The bacterial re growth is encouraged by the lack of a residual disinfectant and by the possibly great availability of nutrients in aggressive water, such the ‘lowmineral’ water, particularly if it has a high temperature.
In areas supplied with drinking water harder than 500 mg/l CaCO3, higher incidence rates of gallbladder disease, urinary stones, arthritis and arthropathies as compared with those supplied with softer water were reported. Other harmful health effects were observed in water rich in dissolved solids showing mineral levels that are not common in drinking water. No evidence is available to document harm to human health from harder drinking water. Besides, an epidemiological study carried out in a particular region found hard water. Now look. Perhaps only a high magnesium content coupled with a high sulphate content may cause diarrhea.
Desirable mineral content of demineralised drinking water In the late 1970’s, the serious poser of an optimum composition of drinking water, particularly if obtained by desalination, was in the centre of attention of the WHO. The WHO also emphasized the importance of mineral composition of drinking water and warned against the use of cation exchange sodium cycle softening in water treatment.
It seemed that any new insight into the poser could not be expected, In the 1980’s the wave of interest in the effect of water hardness on cardio vascular diseases morbidity rather subsided.
While eating habits, climatic conditions and stuff were not adequately taken into account, In other studies, the confounders possibly involved in cardio vascular diseases morbidity like age, ‘socio economic’ factors, alcohol consumption. Rather than at an individual based level and individual exposure to calcium and magnesium from water was not established, these critics asserted that morbidity was evaluated at a population group based level. Of course in the 1990 the existing criticisms studies started to make a brand new challenge to publications of further studies. The focus was on confirming the role of magnesium as a crucial factor of hardness and on first attempts of more general quantification of its protective effect.
Most new epidemiological studies of the 1990’s were able to specify the effect of either calcium or magnesium and in addition focused on morbidity aside from cardio vascular diseases. During the 90’s research confirmed a protective effect of both drinking water magnesium and calcium against cardio vascular diseases, and more data on beneficial effect of these elements in drinking water on human health were presented. More recent studies have provided additional information about minimum and optimum levels of minerals that should’ve been in demineralised drinking water.
At these concentrations, minimum or no adverse health effects were observed and the maximum protective or beneficial health effects of drinking water appear to occur.
Additional studies might be conducted on potential health consequences associated with consumption of both high and low mineral content waters in addition to consideration of water hardness. Water bottlers must also consider providing waters with mineral compositions that are beneficial for population segments. Ca and from 40 to 80 mg/l for Mg and from about 200 to 400 mg/l for water hardness. Since their deficiency have many negative health effects, sufficient evidence is now available to confirm that a certain minimum percentage of minerals in water is desirable. Conclusion and recommendations Minerals are important parts of drinking water and are of both direct and indirect health significance. The optimum Ca and Mg levels in drinking water should lie within the following ranges. Make sure you drop suggestions about it. Nutrient minerals in ‘drinking water’ and the potential health consequences of longterm consumption of demineralised and remineralized and altered mineral content drinkingwaters’, for the most part there’s a need for more precise data on the impact of water composition and intake under a broader range of physiologic and climatic conditions, if you are going to more precisely evaluate the importance of minerals in drinking water on mineral nutrition. National governments and water suppliers should’ve been encouraged to practice stabilization of demineralised water with additives that will increase calcium and magnesium levels and to conduct studies that monitor public health impacts. Titled, as recommended in the rolling revision of the WHO guidelines for drinking water quality. Over the past two decades little research attention was given to the beneficial or protective effects of drinking water substances. Community and bottled water suppliers must provide information to the general public and health professionals on the composition of water for constituents including possibly beneficial substances. Considering the above said. Investigators must consider exposures to both calcium and magnesium levels in combination with other minerals and trace elements that might be present in hard and soft waters, when studies are conducted.
For further information of mineral water.
For further information of mineral water.
Consensus of the meeting August 2004, Nutrient minerals in drinking water and the potential health consequences of long time consumption of demineralized and remineralized and altered mineral content ‘drinking waters’, WHO Share to Twitter
Share to Print
Share to Email
Share to More
About Lenntech >
Lenntech BV Rotterdamseweg 402 M 2629 HH Delft tel.